Finding the ultimate natural metal finish (NMF) technique has always
been something of a Grail Quest for The Hobby, perhaps akin to what discovering
a cure for the common cold is for medicine, developing a Grand Unified
Field theory is for physics or, until 1998 at least, belting more than
60 homers in a season was for baseball. Accordingly, false hopes have
been raised many more times than most modelers would like to remember.
To wit, we have been teased and tempted over the years by various products
claiming to simulate NMF, mostly coming in paint bottles that never quite
seemed to deliver as advertised. No matter how good the results were,
shiny paint is, after all, shiny paint and not aluminum, so there was
always that 'close but no cigar' quality to even the best of them. Then,
of course, there have always been the countless 'sure-fire' homespun techniques
for NMF that have made the gossip and BBS rounds over the years ('ya gotta
use organic sumac lacquer, mirror powder and yearling deerskin buffing
leather, but only during a full moon', 'dust it with Crisco and graphite,
then microwave the sucker' 'Electroplate', etc.). Whatever the gimmick
or trick, however, a real drop-dead, knock-your-socks-off absolutely convincing
NMF technique always seemed an unrealizable dream. Always, that is, until
recent years, now that a small but ever burgeoning number of Fanatic Foil
Freaks (FFFs) are working feverishly and diligently towards making the
dream a reality.
The
real kicker is that the answer to our prayers had never been farther away
than the nearest kitchen cabinet all along. With a little help from a
bottle of Microscale Foil Adhesive, all you need is a roll of cheap (the
cheaper the better I'll get into this later) aluminum kitchen wrap,
a little practice and a whole lotta patience to have show-stopping NMF
aircraft models that will dazzle friends and family alike. As a fellow
FFF on another website has so eloquently put it, 'looks like metal because
it IS metal'. Well, that says it all. Nothing looks more like aluminum
than aluminum. Accept no substitutes, folks.
OK. That's the good news. The bad news is that the technique is rather
difficult, always chancy and often exasperating. But then, when did that
combination of factors ever keep us from building models, right?
What you need
Cheap
aluminum kitchen or cooking foil, mirror-finished on one side, dull on
the other. You DO NOT want the good quality Reynolds Wrap kind of stuff
Mom used on those Christmas fruit cakes. No, that stuff is practically
armor plate compared with the aluminum foil I am using (Toyo Arumi - a
product of resource-starved Japanese manufacture), which has a thickness
of 12 microns (less than most painted surfaces). It is so flimsy it will
rip if you look at it funny. Moral of the story: cheaper quality is better
because it is thinner, and the thinner the foil you use, the better definition
you are going to get to bring out all those good rivets, panel lines,
etc.
Flat artist's brushes about 1/2 inch in width. The quality issue is
paradoxical here, because while you want the brush to be supple enough
not to leave trench-deep brushstrokes in the adhesive backing, you must
also steel yourself to the sad fact that once you use one of these brushes
in this operation, you can never quite get all of the adhesive out of
it, rendering it fairly useless for other painting applications. Pliancy
returns whenever the brush is soaked in alcohol and/or used for more gluing,
but it will always dry to resemble something like a scale scuba flipper
or rubber spatula afterwards.
Microscale
Metal Foil Adhesive. Follow the instructions on the back of the bottle
TO THE LETTER! That should be explanation enough. The glue seems to be
acrylic-based, as its smell and color is similar to white woodworking
glue. It is water-thinnable, although I have tended not to exploit this
property, as I have encountered a lot of beading-up problems enough as
is with the surfaces I've been working with, and I think that thinning
the glue would only exacerbate this. But then again, my experience is
still pretty shallow with the material, and there is a lot more experimentation
that needs to be done. It seems likely that brushstrokes - which are often
visible under the foil after application to the model in the technique
I am using now - would be greatly reduced with thinner glue. In any case,
the matter bears looking into further.
Rubbing alcohol. This is used to clean (as best as possible, that is)
brushes and to clean up dried patches of glue from botched model surfaces
before re-foiling.
Furniture
finishers fine-grit steel wool. Use the densest, thinnest strand wool
you can get. This is used not only in repair and botched surface clean
up operations, but also to apply the all-important finishing touch 'patinaî
of fine scratches over the foil surface to give your model a realistic
NMF sheen. After all, you want your plane to look like it is made out
of aviation Duralmin, not recycled funhouse mirror.
Cotton swabs and round toothpicks. These are used in applying and burnishing
foil. The sharp tip of the toothpick is used to ìreviveî rivets and panel
lines after the foil goes on and the wrinkles have been rubbed out (often
an inexact science but you have to learn to live with that).
A plentiful supply of NEW single-edged razor blades and/or modeling/design
knife blades. Working with foil requires blades as sharp as possible.
Unfortunately, the foil also makes short shrift of any blade that comes
into contact with it, meaning that the half-life of your blade will be
measured in minutes. Literally. I went through about twenty razors and
maybe half as many design knife blades building the F-84.
And last but not least, the 'Three Ps' of foiling: patience, perseverance
and prayer. A little luck doesn't hurt, either.
Starting out
As
Shep Paine once put it, a metallic scheme is the most unforgiving surface
type you can model. Every mote of dust, every finger swipe, every hesitant
brushstroke - in short, every mistake you make with it will stand out
as clearly and gaudily on the finished product as cheap lipstick on a
filling station bathroom mirror. Although much more forgiving (if at least
a bit more readily repairable) than painted metallic schemes, foiling
is still no exception to this rule, so keeping the old adage about 'an
ounce of prevention' in mind and taking a few prudent preparatory steps
will save much heartache later on. First of all, it is crucial that your
work area be as dust-free as possible. A tall order, perhaps, for a modeler,
but a little preventive vacuuming or at least a peremptory sweep-up or
damp cloth wiping of your table certainly can't hurt.
Addressing the foil ('Hello, foil' ! 'To the moon, Norton, to the moon!')
is a matter of careful and mutual respect between man and material. Cut
a workable amount of foil from the roll (i.e., just a little more than
you need for the area you will cover), taking care not to foul either
your piece or the remainder on the roll with small wrinkles. Big wrinkles
can be rubbed out, but the small, tight ones can not. If a piece gets
wrinkled like this, it is unusable.
Lay
the foil dull side up (the matte finish provides 'bite' for the glue,
thus minimizing beading) on a disposable, smooth, dust-free (sorry to
be repetitive, but I can't emphasize this enough) surface. I've found
dry cleaners' shirt-backing cardboard to work nicely. Dip your brush about
a quarter-inch into the glue, then, making sure to keep your brushstrokes
parallel (they'll be slightly visible after the foil goes on, so orient
them to look like stress lines or 'grain' in the metal structure), start
from one end of the foil piece and brush evenly and quickly over to the
other side, covering everything in one pass. (PIC 1) If either puddles
or dry patches appear at this stage, you can (and should) give them a
quick stab or two with the glue brush, but you should do this carefully,
because as a rule of thumb, it is best not to go over the same spot twice.
The reason for this is that, much like uncured paint, the glue-wet brush
will re-liquidize spots from the previous coating, lifting them up and
off the surface as the brush passes over. These will then dry into little
but very inconveniently three-dimensional rubber cement booger-like motes
that are impossible to remove. If this happens, you will have to trash
the piece, cut out another and start all over again.
If
all has gone well, you now wait until the whitish-milky glue has dried
to a dull Scotch tape-like sheen. I like to use my incandescent desk lamp
as a dryer to speed this process up. If you wish to do so, make sure you've
dusted the lampshade recently. If not, you'll get a nice little sprinkling
on your glued foil when you adjust the light over the work area.
Once the pressure sensitive glue has dried, the foil is ready to be
applied. Choose a single point near the center of the area to be foiled,
and aim center-of-mass of your foil piece to touch there and ONLY there.
From this single, central point, begin burnishing out towards the edges,
being careful not to make any more wrinkles than you absolutely have to.
After you have finished burnishing and find, to your horror, that there
are nasty little air blister bubbles in the foil, just lance 'em! Make
a feathery light cut along the bubble from end to end, with just enough
pressure to cut the foil but NOT the plastic underneath. Burnish over
this with the edge of a toothpick, pushing along the same direction as
the cut, and it will all but disappear.
What order foiling?
Before
beginning any foiling, you should study the layout and structural scheme
of your model to determine the order in which you will foil. In general
terms, when working with aircraft, I have found it best to foil fuselage,
wings, stabilizers and (if present) drop tanks separately before assembly.
(PICS 4 - 7) Foiling each distinct airframe component like this keeps
your foil pieces small and manageable, reducing hassle in the event of
'disasters' requiring re-foiling and also helping to prevent wrinkles
and spindles by avoiding abrupt angles (wing joints, etc.) in the surfaces
to be foiled.
The F-84 model
The particular machine I chose to model is 1/LT Dolphin Overton's fighter-bomber
stationed at Taegu, Republic of Korea in 1951. Lieutenant Overton was
a 1949 graduate of West Point who was commissioned in the new Air Force
and later went on to ace status in F-86 Sabres. Aeromaster produces fine
quality decals (AM 48-408 and stencil set AM 148-025) for modeling this
aircraft.
As
goes without saying for anything recent from the House of Tamiya, the
model itself went together without a hitch. Fit was flawless everywhere.
In addition, the lack of irregularly curved surfaces makes this airframe
a good starting project for the beginning foiler, with the only notable
exception being the wingtip and fuselage drop tanks, which are shaped
like something out of a calculus textbook and present a MAJOR foiling
challenge. (PIC 2) The best advice I can give for working with these is
to keep your foil sections small, manageable and parallel, because joints
in the foil on these curved surfaces are rather conspicuous, so it's best
to make them look like they are supposed to be there. Liberal uses of
parallel steel wool strokes will help a lot in masking the joints. If
done well, this can render them almost (emphasis on 'almost') invisible,
not only in the fuel tank construction but in foiling any area on the
aircraft.
Eduard etched parts were used in this model. One nice feature of this
set is that it provides you with an early-type speed brake panel, which
you will need if you are modeling a Korean Conflict-era aircraft. The
'swiss cheese' speed brake panel provided by Tamiya is for mid-50s, post-Korea
Thunderjets (opposite chronology appears in Squadron/Signal's 'F-84 Thunderjet
In Action', proving that it sometimes pays to be wary of your sources!).
OD
anti-glare, yellow trim, cockpit green and yellow zinc chromate are all
done in Model Master acrylics. Be sure to wash the entire model with dishwashing
liquid (I know, I know - this keeps getting weirder and weirder, right?)
and warm water before attempting to lay paint on the aluminum, because
every microscopic nook, cranny and scratch on the surface is filled to
the gills with infinitesimally fine aluminum powder which has been produced
during the sanding, buffing and polishing phase, and if you don't get
this stuff out, the paint will peel right off the model like a burnt omelet
off a Teflon pan. I found this out, to my chagrin, when my entire OD anti-glare
panel lifted off in one clean, contiguous piece along with the masking
tape I peeled off after laying down the paint. Best results are to be
had by using a broad, soft brush to apply the detergent straight onto
the model - undiluted - and lathering it up on the surface. You'll see
that it soon turns gray because of the aluminum dust. Get rid of this
soapy gunk using your airbrush as a kind of sandblaster, spraying the
surface with the warm water under high pressure until all the lather bubbles
are gone. Finally, buff with a soft cloth, and youíre ready for painting/Future-ing/decaling/
etc.
When disaster strikes
The
fundamental weakness inherent in foiling is the simple, physical fact
that you are trying to cover three-dimensional, often irregularly curved
surfaces with an inherently inflexible two-dimensional medium. The most
obvious and commonly occurring consequence of this dynamic is, yes, you
guessed it, wrinkles. I should re-emphasize this by saying that, more
than just commonly occurring, wrinkles are downright unavoidable in foiling.
Now, you can either let that fact break your heart and give up the whole
project, or you can push on and face up to those wrinkles (ha-ha) using
any or any combination of the following options:
Ignore them.
Go over them again and again with a cotton swab or other tool and
try to burnish them away.
Sand them into oblivion with a silicon disc, etc., then lay small
foil panels over the areas where the foil has been removed.
Cut out the affected area, then foil over it.
Consult a good plastic surgeon (ha-ha).
Before
I forget, I should note here that there are two basic schools of thought
regarding foil jointing. One (and perhaps the dominant) school holds that
the best results are to be had by foiling along the panel lines, i.e.,
laying each panel with a separate piece of foil, then cutting away the
excess. The major plus for this process is that does it away with the
need for overlapping foil joints. The downside of this is that the foil
edges are delicate, and when you go back to blacken the panel lines later
on, you will inevitable curl up some of these edges, sometimes requiring
major repair. Also, this process involves freehand blade cutting directly
on top of the plastic. I don't care how good of a brain surgeon you may
be, there is just no way that you are going to leave those panel lines
the way you found them after you have gone over them with an X-acto knife.
The damage may be minimal, but it is there, and if your personality is
anything like mine, it will bother you later on just knowing that it is
there, and will catch your eye every time.
The
method I prefer is to live with joints in peaceful co-existence (thus
nicely preserving the integrity of my panel lines). In other words, I
try to cover as much surface with one piece as I can while keeping the
size manageable and deliberately avoiding laying the edges along panel
lines. Despite its thinness, foil is amazingly tough and resilient under
abrasives, and I use this quality of the material to maximum advantage
in employing abrasives and buffing agents to hide joints.
In any case, experiment with an old model to find a technique that
works for you.
On a related and final note, dealing with sharp edges like trailing
wing edges and control surfaces presents another choice of technique.
One technique, which is the easier but, as I have discovered, far less
satisfactory of the two is to simply foil out to the end of the edge and
just trim away the excess. This may look fine for a while, but after even
the slightest handling, the edges are in dire danger of curling up. If
that starts to happen, all you can do is to keep mashing them down or
to keep cutting away, hoping that the process will eventually stop before
you've denuded the entire aircraft.
An overlapping technique is by far more effective in producing durable
and convincing edges. Foil the upper surfaces clean over the top and around
to the bottom, where you can joint in a fairly inconspicuous spot under
the aircraft. A little touch up with your trusty sanding tools and some
elbow grease with the steel wool again and you're in business.
Conclusions
Foiling,
obviously, is not for everyone. The average modeler, with an average patience
limit, would be better off sticking to the trusty airbrush and investing
in a bottle of SnJ (which is supposed to be excellent, I understand).
For this author and the slowly, slowly burgeoning ranks of FFFs, however,
nothing looks more like aluminum than aluminum, and even with its significant
flaws, foiling can not be bested in simulating Duralmin NMFs in scale
aircraft modeling. Let the results speak for themselves:
Media used:
Tamiya 1/48 F-84G Thunderjet
Aeromaster decal sets 'Thunderjets Over Korea, Pt.II' AM 48-808
And 'F-84 Stencil Set' AM 148-025
Eduard photoetched parts set #48257for TAM F-84G Thunderjet
Model Master acrylic paints (pack type)
Microscale Foil Adhesive
Toyo Arumi aluminum foil
References:
F-84 Thunderjet in Action by Larry Davis, Squadron/Signal, 1983
Mig Alley by Larry Davis, Squadron/Signal, 1978
Korean War Aces by Robert F. Dorr, Jon Lake and Warren Thompson,
Osprey Aircraft of the Aces No.4, Osprey, 1995
IPMS
Norway